“The Pope is now closer to God”

So as I flip back and forth between the news channels, witnessing the cadres of mostly WASPy faces contorted with grief over Il Papa, I can’t help but think many a thing. I shall list forthwith:

1. What if the Pope ends up on life support for years? Does the Pope have a Living Will? Would he still continue to be Pope? Would the Cardinals get fed up, the visitors leave, and would someone unplug him?

2. Does that little song they are singing in the rosary vigil sound like a lullaby to anyone else?

3. Isn’t it interesting that although only about less than one-fourth of the world is actually Roman Catholic, the news about the Pope’s passing is completely dominating the airwaves and pretty much paralyzing the world?

4. How is Prince Rainier doing anyway? I mean…. he was in a bad enough shape that even the Pope sent him “get well” wishes, and yet he hasn’t died either. Or has he? Not that we’d know, since the news channels are glutted with “Pope DeathWatch.”

5. Consdering that John Paul II has been hailed as a uniter of the world, and a defender of the free world and a crusader against communism, he’s certainly destroyed the good work of John XXIII and Vatican II (you know? All religions in dialogue and reconciling their differences?). Conflicted does not begin to describe what’s in my mind.

6. But at the same time… will there be another Papa as famous, charismatic and world-traveling? What’s going to happen to the PopeMobile? Will any of his Cardinals be perfectly fine kissing babies and airport runways and giving long speeches? Will there be another Pope with as much hipness as the Pope?

7. What about the Pope’s extremely traditional and conservative agenda? Earlier, a woman called Kiera McCaffrey from the Catholic League uttered with a straight face a statement that went along the lines of, “Homosexuals are, of course, 100% loved by God. But, you know…. homosexual relationships are just not acceptable[that is not a direct quote, but a paraphrase, and I apologize if anything was taken out of context].” In essence, what she said was that homosexuals –damaged people though they are– are still loved by God, but, well…. you know! Homosexual sex is dirty and wrong and God will smite you if you do it [and that was my own version just now]. Which to me represents the weird mental schism you must have in order to be a Catholic. Or at least, the weird mental schism I would have to have if I were one, because I am of the simple idea that love is love and anyone’s sex life is no one’s business but that person’s.

8. I’m glad the Pope is not allowing cameras to capture his final moments. Let the poor man have some dignity.

9. The only news item to interrupt the steady Papal stream? News of Theresa Schiavo’s cremation. At long last, sir: have you no sense of dignity?
(or decency, really).

I guess the only truth I can assert at this point in time is this: Life is dukkha– annoying, inconvenient and always a little disjointed. The way to get over being inconvenienced is to ultimately get over yourself somehow and just let go and let life take its course. And that is usually the hardest part.

The Pope has just died.

God bless you, Karol Wojtyla. May you be in a better place. Amen.

Advertisements
This entry was published on April 2, 2005 at 2:58 pm and is filed under Religion. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.

2 thoughts on ““The Pope is now closer to God”

  1. Patrick on said:

    Isn’t it strange that we are now WITHOUT A POPE!? When a king dies, we say long live the king. When the President dies, the vice-president is automatically the president. But right now we are living in a pope-less time.
    Enjoy your Pope-free-zone!

  2. David Millson on said:

    The death of Pope John Paul II seems to have opened the floodgates of reservoirs of angst all over the country. Having skimmed most of them, I am concerned that the Pope bashers are among thos people who, when entering a Dunkin’ Donuts, see hundreds of holes… but no donuts.
    Some complain that the flag of the United States should not be lowered for a (religious figure)(foreign dignitary)(person some of whose views are disagreeable to writers)(a — dare I say it? — _man_ leading over 1¼ BILLION religious people among the world’s population.
    These remind me of nothing as much as the loose (loosely wired?) agglomeration of Bush bashers: myopics whose personal angst, though too weak or ill-directed, impels them to mask their peevishness as criticize for almost anything the President does.
    Cut to the chase: Homosexuals, proabortion people, activists for a greater role of women in the Church (myself among them), and more, lay on their backs, kicking their heels and screaming because the one thing over which they have a grievance is not being addressed.
    It is through the general offices of the Pope that the greatest dollar amount of aid to the world’s poor is channeled; the Catholic Church and her allied charitable and relief organizations does more than every nation in the world to combat hunger, AIDS, other diseases, and homelessness.
    For some of those billion-plus, the Pope has been a stalwart advocate, worthy of emulation and, thus, providing both an example and a center for lives in turmoil; he is, for many, the living proof of a risen Messiah in the form of the continuity of Christianity through more than two millennia.
    So… maybe you’re an angry homosexual (whom God loves without being asked); or a woman who wants to be a priest; or a “man” who wants his Catholic girlfriend to get an abortion; or a liberal who sees the Pope as a promulgator of rules you just hate, hate, hate. But for the billion-plus, he’s been a source, if not of material aid, surely of spiritual steadfastness that has helped them cope with the rigors and vicissitudes of life.
    Would you have these of God’s children face horrors with no faith, no succor, no belief in a better Future?
    Yep.
    That’s called selfishness… though I suspect most of the critics would be glad to tell us how selfless they are.
    Why do liberals tolerate everyone… except the people they *hate*?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: